FHA Mortgage Insurance and Seller Concession Changes – Ramifications

HUD has regrettably increased the annual mortgage insurance premium and soon will have succeeded in reducing the allowable seller concessions.  It's easy to know that this will have a big impact but it will actually change the lending landscape by dramatically decreasing FHA's presence in the marketplace and shifting loan volume to Fannie Mae and FreddieMac who share an uncertain future to say the least.  It will also shift loans to private mortgage insurers, most of whom are either financially anemic or are still reeling from the volatile markets of the last 2.5 years.  And it needn't be said that the private sector isn't ready, willing and able to jump into the residential housing lending market just yet.  In a time where tinkering with the housing market should be done delicately, this change will torpedo an already fragile housing market.

IMPACT ON AFFORDABILITY AND HOUSE PRICES

A buyer in Saint Paul, MN purchasing a three bedroom home at the median sales price and qualifying with Saint Paul's median household income, is going to be a harder thing to do.  Let's use these statistical examples and assume the borrower has a car loan of 330 dollars a month and a credit card payment of 65 dollars.  Currently, this is affordable.  Now that FHA has increased the annual mortgage insurance premium, this same buyer will now lose $6,500 in purchasing power and could not purchase at 151,000 dollars but rather at 145,500 or more interestingly 4.3% less of the Saint Paul median sales price (assuming market property taxes and hazard insurance rates).  So, with this change, an entire class of buyer has lost purchasing power and whenever this many people lose this kind of purchasing power, it would be naïve to think that it won't have an adverse impact on already precarious home prices.

With these changes in place, it will make more sense for nearly all buyers with a credit score of 680 or higher and debt to income ratios of 45% or lower to use conventional financing.  Firstly, private mortgage insurance will be equal to or cheaper than FHA insurance in most cases.  Secondly, there are more choices in types of mortgage insurance and means of payment with conventional financing.  Thirdly, after HUD reduces allowable seller concessions, the allure of a low down payment loan with FHA will be gone to this type of borrower (this change is a back door way of FHA increasing the down payment requirement).  Some may see a silver lining in these changes but it will have unintended consequences.

EFFECT ON BUYER'S LOAN DECISIONS AND UNFORESEEN CONSEQUENCES

Each mortgage insurance company has its own set of underwriting guideline overlays and most have their own declining markets lists.  With some, if a property is in the wrong zip code it will be subject to a loan amount cut of 5% of the appraised value or purchase price (whichever is less).  With others you won't know if a loan might get cut until the appraisal comes back.  If the appraisal comes back with the "oversupply" or "declining" box checked in the One Unit Housing Trends section, a loan officer might only know then that the loan will be cut. 

To navigate this, a loan officer must have control over the selection of their mortgage insurance provider and know their respective guidelines.  Some do but they are the best of the best.  In short, buyers, sellers and Realtors will be subject to unexpected transactional disruptions when this trend inevitably emerges.  Sadly, these transactional difficulties will happen to the very best of borrowers. 

WHICH BORROWERS WILL BE DRAWN TO FHA LOANS NOW?

Despite the changes, there will still be buyer and borrower profiles that make a match for FHA.  Here is a brief list:

  • 203K rehabilitation mortgages
  • HECM reverse mortgages
  • Loans for borrowers with credit scores at or under 679  & with loan to values over 80 percent
  • Loans for borrowers with high debt (many investors will approve FHA loans for borrowers with debt to income ratios of up to 55%)
  • Loans for borrowers who either own or are buying a home in a declining market (FHA loans aren't cut if a property is in a declining market)
  • FHA to FHA streamline refinances (although they are now less appealing as well)
  • Loans in need of manual underwriting due to no credit or strange circumstances such as incorrect data on a credit report from an ex-spouse if the items are covered by a divorce decree

That's about it.

HAS HUD SUCCEEDED IN THEIR GOALS?

HUD's stated objective in making this change was to shore up their capital base.  The not so stated objective was to reduce their market share.  They will succeed in the latter (with a flight of high quality borrowers).  Ironically, they will fail in their stated objective.  While it may work out financially for HUD in the short term, we have to consider the long-term consequences of HUD chasing the highest quality borrowers away from their insured portfolio leaving behind an insured portfolio of loans that will have a lower average credit score, higher average debt to income ratios and the loans will be secured by housing that will be more susceptible to being in a declining market.  These soon-to-emerge portfolio weaknesses will increase the number of defaults and claims against the FHA insurance fund and, in time, this policy change will be looked back on as a disaster.  It is likely that this change is HUD cutting off its nose to spite its face.

Charles Dailey - iLoan - NMLS ID# 79048 - CA DOC, MN DOC & WI DFI

20 commentsCharles Dailey - NMLS ID# 79048 • September 02 2010 02:11AM

Get out your permanent markers, HUD seeks public comment on three main issues for FHA loans

 

Via Jeff Belonger -- The FHA Expert.com -- FHA Loans -- FHA mortgages - USDA loans (Infinity Home Mortgage Company, Inc):

You can make a difference - you have 30 days to comment against FHA's proposals

you can make a difference with FHA loans

 

With a difficult economy and possibly some new FHA mortgage changes coming in the new future, this could be time to make your voice heard. HUD made this announce back in January 20th, 2010 - FHA announces policy changes to address risk and strengthen finances - I parlayed this announcement into layman's terms. - FHA loans and some possible mortgage changes.

 

So now, FHA just announced that there will be a 30 day period for comments on these issues described above.  These proposals are designed to limit the risk in regards to the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund and at the same time, trying to promote sustainable homeownership for FHA borrowers.

 

 

 

The 3 possible changes to FHA Loans :

FHA loans list of proposals

 

1. Changing the combination of credit scores and downpayments. You will need a credit score of 580 or above to still be eligible for the regular 3.5% downpayment. If below 580, you will be required to put 10% down. And FHA loans will not allow any loans with credit scores below 500.

My opinion :  I am not concerned with this proposal. Most lenders require credit scores of 620 or higher on FHA loans. I wrote about it here. - FHA home loans have no minimum credit scores - So FHA, you can have this one.

 

2. The reduction of seller concessions from 6% to 3%. Many of us know that this could have a huge impact on many different housing markets.

My opinion : I truly think this could affect those buying homes from $150,000 and below. Especially those homes prices at $100,000 and below. That would mean on a $100,000 home, the buyer could only get $3,000 of help towards closing costs. - FHA, since I gave you #1, I want #2, and keep it at 6%. Update... keep this in mind - If a borrower has to come up with more money now, what does that do to their cash reserves in many cases.  In troubled times, does this mean that they will default quicker now?

 

3. To tighten FHA underwriting standards for manually underwritten loans. FHA's purpose would be when using compensating factors while underwriting, lenders will be required to consider those factors which would be best predictive indicators of the performance of the loan.

My opinion : I guess I would have to wait for a better explanation letter in the mortgagee letter, if this is approved.  You already are required top have compensating factors when manually underwriting a FHA loan, making sure that the loan will perform. I just think this is FHA's way of saying that they want underwriters to be more critical when approving a loan and to have more solid compensating factors. Ex. Instead of making sure that your borrower had 2 months in reserves (money left over after closing to cover 2 mortgage payments), that they would like to see 6 months. Who really knows on this one. Could be more political chit chat.

 

 

 

Conclusion : As I mentioned above, I am not worried about numbers 1 and 3. But number 2 could have an impact on the housing market in many areas. On the positive side of things, HUD could have increased the down payment to 5%. This was talked about in congress several times, but shot down. Talk of FHA loans raising the down payment to 5%. -  Here is the argument about why some want more money down. The FHA argument - I want more skin in the game.

 

 

Where and how to comment :

Regulations.gov - (main site) please to search for government proposals.I give the specific page below, where to comment.

 

Here is the link to the different proposals and FHA's reasoning's for such proposals. Federal Register for HUD changes and the reasons why. If you go to the middle of the first page, you will see how they explain the different ways to comment. They highly suggest doing it electronically, which I mention below.

 

 

CALL to ACTION : Send this to other agents and loan officers.  Don't hesitate to reblog this, to get the message out.

 

Here is the actual page to go and make your comments - Comments for reduction of seller concessions and new loan to value with credit scores - Click submit a comment which is on the right side of this page, in blue.

 

 

 

Important Update as of 7/17/10 @ 1:05 pm - Please read and make your voice heard - If you are going to comment to FHA, please copy and paste this link into your comment :  http://activerain.com/blogsview/1749213/issues-regarding-the-3-seller-help-proposal-by-fha-can-we-fight-fha-loans-with-solutions-yes-   (this article is below)

Issues regarding the 3% seller help proposal by FHA - Can we fight FHA Loans with solutions?? - YES !!!

 

 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

follow Jeff Belonger on Twitter               The FHA Expert   

                                                                                                           FOLLOW ME ON FACEBOOK

 

 

- FHA Loans - USDA Loans - VA Loans -

- Energy Efficient Mortgages - 

- Conventional Loans - 203 k loans -

- FHA Home Loans - Mortgages -

 

Experience & Knowledge at its BEST !!!

 

 

Follow me on:

Mortgage Myth Busters

 

 

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

For more information on FHA loans, please go to this link. The FHA Expert

For important mortgage insight to watch for, please read : Consumers need to be aware of these Red Flags!

HUD

For information about FHA myths & FHA rumors, please read : FHA Myths & Rumors

 

Copyright © 2010 by Jeff Belonger of Infinity Home Mortgage Company, Inc

Charles Dailey - iLoan - NMLS ID# 79048 - CA DOC, MN DOC & WI DFI

0 commentsCharles Dailey - NMLS ID# 79048 • July 17 2010 03:37PM

Foreclosure Deficiency Judgment Compared to Deed In Lieu and Short Sale Scenarios

 

Via Richard Zaretsky, Florida Real Estate Attorney (Richard P. Zaretsky P.A. - Bd Certified Real Estate Attorney):

We get so many questions about what is a DEFICIENCY JUDGMENT and how it differs from other possibilities including DEED IN LIEU OF FORECLOSURE or SHORT SALE.  Recent blogs and Broker Bryant provided a request that I write a detailed article explaining and differentiating these three items.

This article is written based on Florida law, but most state laws are similar.  Be sure to contact your own attorney for your state laws, and always consult your own attorney on any legal decision you need to make.  This article is for information purposes and is not specific advice to any one reader.

As a suggestion, for information on the basics of a deed in lieu of foreclosure and short sale, see SHORT SALE PRIMER - LAWYER DISCUSSION OF THE SHORT SALE EVOLUTION

Let me clarify an important issue that will have meaning later.  A "Mortgage" is NOT the obligation to pay the bank.  The obligation to pay the bank back the money it loaned along with interest is called the "Promissory Note".  The bank makes two types of loans.  Secured loans are when the bank wants the Promissory Note to be collateralized with something of value.  In real estate that "something of value" is usually a "Mortgage" and it collateralizes or secures the Promissory Note with the house or other real estate.  So when we say only the word "Mortgage", technically you are referring only to the security document and not the Promissory Note.  Likewise when we say the words "Promissory Note", we are referring only to the obligation to repay the bank.

THE LAW OF MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE:

A mortgage foreclosure (some incorrectly call it a "Lis Pendens") is filed by the lender when the Promissory Note that is secured with a Mortgage on some real estate (usually the home) has not been paid on time (the "default"). 

If there was only an "unsecured" Promissory Note and there was no Mortgage, the suit would not be called a "mortgage foreclosure" because it would only demand payment of the Promissory Note and then the judge after hearing the evidence, would likely issue a Final Judgment against the borrower and in favor of the bank for the amount of the unpaid Promissory Note along with accrued interest, late fees and court costs and attorney fees.  The Final Judgment would also be entitled to interest (in Florida that rate is now 6% a year) until the Final Judgment is paid in full.

A mortgage foreclosure is actually a four step process.

Step One:  The first step is to file suit (called the "Complaint") on the non-payment of the Promissory Note. (Yes, there are other reasons for a foreclosure suit to be filed, like an unauthorized transfer of the real estate, or non-payment of the real estate taxes, but we are going to focus on not paying the Promissory Note). An action (the suit) is filed at the courthouse and it consists of 3 documents.  The first document is a Summons, which directs you to answer the Complaint.  The second document is the Complaint, which describes why the bank is entitled to the relief it is asking for - the payment on the Promissory Note.  The third document is the Lis Pendens, which puts the public at large on notice (since the lis pendens is filed in the public records where the property is located) that anyone dealing with the property should know that a claim has been made against the property in the Mortgage.  (Lis Pendens literally means "pending litigation" and is one of those fancy Latin words that we lawyers banter about).

The Complaint will describe that there was a Promissory Note signed by the borrower to evidence that it was to repay the bank the money, and that to induce the bank to make the loan the borrower also signed a Mortgage on some real estate that promised that if the Promissory Note was not paid, the real estate could be sold and the proceeds would be used to pay the Promissory Note.  It will also say how much is unpaid and what additional money the bank may want for the non-payment of real estate taxes, for example.  It will finally make a "demand", which will ask that if the borrower does not make payment on the Promissory Note to the bank, then the real estate should be sold under court supervision at a public auction, and if there is insufficient money bid for the real estate, the court should give to the bank a judgment for the shortfall (the "Deficiency Judgment"). A quick note to those that subscribe to the foreclosure defense analysis that they won't have to pay the bank - I suggest you read FORECLOSURE DEFENSE FALLACY.

Step Two:  After statutory time periods have run (for example, 20 days to answer the Complaint, the bank can more for a final judgment.  This is usually accomplished (in Florida) with a Motion for Summary Judgment, or similar name.  Another 20 days must elapse before this hearing can take place, once the motion is filed.  In reality (at least in Palm Beach County right now) that time period can be several months before a court date on the Motion for Summary Judgment can take place.

At the Motion for Summary Judgment hearing the bank must prove that there is a valid Mortgage securing a valid Promissory Note and that it is unpaid.  The judge will then issue a Final Judgment of Foreclosure that says (1) if the borrower does not pay the bank the amount the bank proved is due to the bank within usually 30 days, the real estate is ordered to be sold by the clerk of the court to the highest bidder, and if the highest bidder bids less than the amount due to the bank then the bank can come back to court and request a Deficiency Judgment.  It is important to note that the Final Judgment of Foreclosure is NOT a money judgment against the borrower!  However, depending on step three below the bank can move to obtain a money judgment later on.  IMPORTANT note to borrowers who think that THIS is the hearing when you can go and tell your story to the judge.  WRONG!!!!!!!  The Summary Judgment hearing takes no testimony in open court.  It is based only on what is in the court file - nothing more.  It is a hearing based on technicalities and strict rules. I can practically guaranty you that if you or your attorney have done nothing up to the hearing in the case to establish why the judgment can not summarily be granted, unless the lender's attorney is totally asleep, the Final Judgment for Foreclosure will be granted.

Step Three:  Assuming that the borrower has not paid the bank to the bank's satisfaction during that 30 day period, the public sale (the "foreclosure sale") will occur.  It is conducted by the Clerk of the Court and it usually occurs "on the courthouse steps", but more usually in a courtroom or meeting hall or even in a large hallway in some courthouses and more recently, on the Web.  The property is announced and bidding starts at $100 and goes up from there.  The bank is able to bid for the property and it will do so to "protect" the collateral up to the amount (and usually beyond) the bank has determined the property is worth.  Usually the bank will bid up the amount of the judgment it received from the judge.  More often than not the property gets sold to the bank for a mere $100 and there are no other bidders at the foreclosure sale.

Step Four:   I am now again making as assumption.  The assumption is that the bank ended up with the property at the foreclosure sale by bidding one hundred dollars.  In that event the borrower still owes the bank money to satisfy the promissory note.  The amount of the remaining balance is what is in question.

To figure get the balance of the monies the bank must go back to court to ask the court to award it a "Deficiency Judgment".  The amount is what is in question and the amount is measured using various rules.  In our example the bank bid $100.  The court is not going to say that the house was worth $100 and $324,900 is still owed.  For our assumption and as an example we will say that the property is worth $200,000 and the foreclosure judgment is for $325,000.  That means the court will ask for an appraisal of the property as of the day of the foreclosure sale and the judge will likely give it that value.  So it will be the appraisal value less the judgment amount which will equal the Deficiency Judgment.  If the appraisal is $250,000, the Deficiency Judgment would be $75,000.   Now if there was real bidding at the foreclosure sale the judge could consider that bidding and instead adopt the selling price under the competitive bidding process that occurred at the foreclosure sale.  Then the Deficiency Judgment would be the difference from the foreclosure judgment and the winning bid amount. If the competitive bid was $240,000, then the Deficiency Judgment would be $85,000.

A little issue that comes up is how long the bank has to get the deficiency judgment.  The Florida Statute of Limitations (time to enforce) the Promissory Note is 5 years from the time it went into default.  There is also a rule on how long a plaintiff can keep open a lawsuit that has no activity.  That rule says after 1 year of inactivity, the lawsuit can be dismissed by the court.  The rule is referred to the "Failure to Prosecute Within One Year" rule.  IF the court dismisses the lawsuit after one year and before the bank asks for a deficiency judgment, it could be argued that the bank cannot again seek to enforce the promissory note. 

Florida courts have noted that a claim for deficiency in a foreclosure action does not accrue until the foreclosure sale has occurred.  Thus the five year period starts at the time of the foreclosure sale (not the time of the default).  The courts have not addressed the one year "failure to prosecute" issue, but it is likely that a decision on it would consider that a deficiency action is separate and could be filed as new action based on the accrual of the event at the time of the foreclosure sale that resulted in the deficiency. (See Chrestensen v. Erogest, Inc., 906 So. 2d 343 (Fla 4th DCA 2005). Recent cases now provide that notwithstanding that the court could dismiss the foreclosure case after one year, that dismissal would not bar the filing of the claim during the 5 years after it accrued.

DEED IN LIEU OF FORECLOSURE

Almost every client I meet with first starts out wondering if they should "just give the property back to the bank".  This is also called "Buy and Bail" and "Strategic Default" and "Walking Away from the Property".  I tell them first off that, "it ain't so easy." 

A Deed In Lieu of foreclosure has many prerequisites.  The first is that the property cannot reasonable expect to be able to be sold within a reasonable period of time.  The second is that the bank to receive the Deed In Lieu must be the only lienor.  This usually means there can be no second mortgage and the borrower and property must be clean of any claims or judgments from other creditors.  In other words the title to the property must be "clean" except for the bank's mortgage.  (Note that if the bank with the first mortgage also has the second mortgage or HELOC, the Deed In Lieu is still a possibility. Indeed, some first lenders will have their counsel seek to negotiate with the 2nd lenders even if it is a different lender, to get the deed in lieu of foreclosure accomplished.) 

The issue remains - what becomes of the disposition of the Promissory Note?  There is documentation in a Deed In Lieu that is very important to the borrower.  This documentation can be an agreement in conjunction with the deed to the bank, or it can be written right into the deed to the bank from the borrower for the subject property.  In any event the document(s) must provide that as part of the consideration for the giving the property to the bank the Promissory Note is satisfied in full.  If this language is included, then there is no further liability of the borrower to the bank and no lawsuit to enforce the Promissory Note can occur.  Most of all, banks don't like to have to sell your property so they don't like taking property to have to manage and sell.  It is expensive to take in your property and unless your property is worth more than the amount the bank loaned to you, the bank is likely to only loose more money than if you sold it for them.  That is why they generally prefer to do short sales rather than deeds in lieu.

Short Sale Negotiation:

A short sale by its nature does not encompass a lawsuit to foreclose the Mortgage or a lawsuit to enforce the Promissory Note, and that is one of the primary advantages of this method of loan workout.  On the other hand, there is often a Mortgage Foreclosure Suit already in progress when a short sale is attempted to be negotiated.  [It is important to realize that a short sale "attempt" does NOT stop a Mortgage Foreclosure Suit!  The bank may or may not instruct its attorneys to delay acting on certain aspects of the suit - usually getting the Foreclosure Judgment or if one is issued, then delaying the actual conducting of the Foreclosure Sale. Don't assume anything positive about the foreclosure suit unless you have it in writing from the lender]. See the article: FORECLOSURE EXPRESS VS. LITTLE ENGINE THAT COULD

The short sale does often times result in a "Release" of the lien of the Mortgage but not a "Cancellation" or "Satisfaction" of the Promissory Note.  It is this remaining financial obligation that is the crux of so much discussion about "1099's" and forgiveness of debt.  Sellers Always Have Income is a comprehensive article on the subject and also deals with recent legislation on how income does not have to be recognized.

Unless a release or satisfaction of the entire Promissory Note or in the case of a property with more than one loan, then each Promissory Note is obtained, there remains the ability of the bank or banks to sue the borrower for the balance of the unpaid promissory note.  In the case of a 2nd Mortgage, this might be the entire amount of that loan if the 2nd Mortgage bank took nothing so the short sale could succeed. 

The documentation regarding a short sale is very important.  The borrower needs to know what further obligations could be in the future as a result of the short sale.  Like the Deficiency Judgment statute of limitations, the balance of the Promissory Note must be enforced within 5 years of the default or the demand for payment by the bank. 

If the unpaid balance of the Promissory Note is enforced by the bank, then it can file a lawsuit against the borrower (if done within that 5 year period which start time could be as early as the declared default if there is no foreclosure sale) and the result will almost always be a Judgment for the payment of money in the amount of the unpaid portion of the Promissory Note.  Many persons that short sell and do not get a release of the Promissory Note utilize an offer to pay back all or a portion of the Promissory Note balance with a new unsecured promissory note.  This new promissory note replaces the old Promissory Note.  The new promissory note can also be enforced by the bank in the same way as the old Promissory Note, but the time to enforce it will be based on whatever new default might occur if the terms of the new promissory note are not followed by the borrower. For a specific article on Short Sales, see Back to Basics - a Review of Short Sales.

The Second Bite from the Apple

An interesting twist is being used by the banks.  They take the now unsecured remaining balance of the promissory note, or the new negotiated promissory note, and sell it to investors for 5 to 10 cents on the dollar.  Then the new investor tries to collect on the promissory note.  This is mentioned in my article on Negotiated Paybacks.  Obviously this represents an opportunity to negotiate the remaining balance a borrower may have on the old loan - sort of a second bite at the apple.

Opportunity abounds for finding solutions for those that need a short sale or find themselves in a foreclosure action.  No solution is a panacea for the borrower's troubles, but the solutions present an ability for a borrower to make a bad situation a little less bad, and it gives some control to the borrower over what is otherwise a nightmarish situation.

Copyright 2010 Richard P. Zaretsky, Esq.

Be sure to contact your own attorney for your state laws, and always consult your own attorney on any legal decision you need to make.  This article is for information purposes and is not specific advice to any one reader.

Richard Zaretsky, Esq., RICHARD P. ZARETSKY P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW, 1655 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD, SUITE 900, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401, PHONE 561 689 6660 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting   email: RPZ99@Florida-Counsel.com - FLORIDA BAR BOARD CERTIFIED IN REAL ESTATE LAW - We assist Brokers and Sellers with Short Sales and Modifications and Consult with Brokers and Sellers Nationwide!  Shortsales@Florida-Counsel.com  New Website www.Florida-Counsel.com

See our easy to understand articles at:

TABLE OF CONTENTS - SHORT SALE AND LOAN MODIFICATION ARTICLES

Charles Dailey - iLoan - NMLS ID# 79048 - CA DOC, MN DOC & WI DFI

0 commentsCharles Dailey - NMLS ID# 79048 • July 10 2010 04:38PM

Yes, My Buyer Has the Money to Buy . . . Does Your Seller Have the Money to Sell?

Via Trent Cluley -- Pickens County Georgia Real Estate (Keller Williams Realty - Select Partners):

Yes, My Buyer Has the Money to Buy . . . Does Your Seller Have the Money to Sell? Get the facts on the seller's ability to sell, before putting the home on the market!

I believe it is pretty standard real estate practice in most areas to have a pre-qualification / pre-approval letter (or proof of funds), to submit to the seller along with the buyer's offer.  It reassures the seller and provides the buyer a stronger bargaining position.

In fact, experienced agents generally like to have a copy of this letter from the buyer's lender, before they even begin showing homes to the buyer. Kinda makes sense really.  Why waste everyone's time looking at, or making offers on, homes the buyer can't afford? That's nothing but a one-way ride down Heartbreak Alley for all concerned.

The seller's ability to sell on the other hand has always been assumed.  There is no request for a "lender clearance letter" from the seller, verifying that the seller can afford to sell, prior to an offer being submitted by a buyer. Of course, this is because part of a listing agent's responsibility should include getting payoff information and preparing a net sheet or estimate of proceeds for the seller when listing a property. So it makes sense that any offer accepted by the seller should ensure that the loan payoff and other closing expenses are covered, or the seller has sufficient cash on hand to close.

Because, yeah, it sucks pretty bad -- as recently happened to me -- to have to explain to your buyer just days before closing that well, see, the seller actually can't afford to sell at the agreed upon price. He in fact owes tens of thousands of dollars more than the agreed upon price. It's particularly bad to have to explain this to buyers who expressly said they weren't interested in looking at / offering on short sale properties, due to the hassles and delays involved. Uh, awkward . . .

It's one thing to embark on the short sale saga when forewarned and armed for battle, it's another to be blindsided by it.

Obviously in this business there are always unexpected turns and unforeseen scenarios that are hard to predict (the above case being one such extremely unusual transaction), but clearly this is not an isolated instance and I am not the only one to have had this experience.

I recently closed a transaction on a listing of mine here in Pickens County GA, where the young, first-time home buyer, was at closing for a second time within a couple of months. His prior transaction had fallen apart at the closing table, when it was "discovered" that the seller was selling short, without lender approval, and therefore couldn't close. (How it got that far without being flagged by someone sooner is beyond me.)

I now get calls from other agents who want to show my listings, but who preface the conversation with something like, "Can the seller close at this price? Is there a possibility it will be a short sale? Just thought I'd check before wasting my buyer's time . . ." Sounds like they too have been burned by the "undisclosed", "unknown" short sale.

I think we all get the fact that short sales are on the rise. They are part of our environment and will be for some time. But, just as we pre-qualify buyers, we need to pre-qualify sellers and disclose up front whether or not it is a short sale, or has the potential to be a short sale. It is also important to double-check the numbers before the seller accepts any offer, particularly if the offer is substantially lower than list price, or the home has been on the market for a while, not just as an essential part of our duty to our clients, but as a courtesy to other agents and the public as well.

Seems like common sense, but . . .

Trent D Cluley
Keller Willliams Realty - Select Partners
770-757-3399
EMAIL

www.PickensGeorgiaRealEstate.com

SEARCH ALL PICKENS COUNTY & NORTH GA HOMES AND LAND FOR SALE!

Charles Dailey - iLoan - NMLS ID# 79048 - CA DOC, MN DOC & WI DFI

4 commentsCharles Dailey - NMLS ID# 79048 • June 18 2010 10:32AM

Fannie Mae Now on Board with their own Short Sale Program

Via Michelle Bailey (Prudential Idaho Realty):
Fannie Mae finally comes on board...Hopefully this program is more successful than the current HAFA program. Right now I'm feeling lots of promises with no sign of ACTION. Don't tell me what you think I want to hear. Show me something that will HELP my clients!

From HousingWire

Fannie Mae (FNM: 0.9315 +0.16%) announced its version of the Making Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA) program Tuesday, implementing the program for all conventional mortgages that are held in Fannie's portfolio, that are part of an mortgage-backed security (MBS) pool with a special servicing option, or that are part of a shared-risk MBS pool for which Fannie Mae markets the acquired property.

The Fannie Mae program takes effect August 1, 2010 and is designed to mitigate the impact of foreclosures on borrowers who are eligible for a loan modification under the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) but were unsuccessful in obtaining one, Fannie said. Like the Treasury Department's HAFA program, servicers cannot consider a borrower for HAFA until the borrower is evaluated and eliminated from eligibility for a Making Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) workout plan.

Also like the Treasury program, Fannie Mae will offer servicers cash incentives for completed HAFA transactions, $2,200 for short sales and $1,200 for deed-in-lieu of foreclosure agreements. Borrowers are also eligible for $3,000 in incentives.

That's more than in the Treasury's HAFA program, where servicers are eligible for $1,500. Under the Treasury program, borrowers receive $3,000. In addition, the investor is also eligible for a maximum of $2,000 incentive.

Participating servicers will be required to report on their Fannie Mae HAFA activities to both Fannie and the Treasury and the program sunsets on December 31, 2012.

After announcing the program in October 2009, Treasury's HAFA program began in April. The Fannie Mae HAFA program is the latest in a string of programs designed to help borrowers avoid foreclosure. In addition to HAFA and HAMP workouts, Fannie Mae is letting some distressed borrowers stay in their homes as renters, under the deed for lease (D4L) program.

Under D4L, the homeowner-turned-renter is required to pay fair market rent to stay in their home for up to 12 months. The renter must have enough income to sustain a 31% income-to-rent ratio and rental payments are not subsidized by Fannie Mae, but could include renters eligible for Section 8 payments.

Also, in March 2010, Fannie Mae instructed its servicers to consider an "alternative modifications" for all mortgages that did not qualify for a permanent conversion under HAMP. That "Alt Mod" program, which sunsets on August 31, 2010, is similar to HAFA.

Article from HousingWire

Charles Dailey - iLoan - NMLS ID# 79048 - CA DOC, MN DOC & WI DFI

3 commentsCharles Dailey - NMLS ID# 79048 • June 04 2010 04:06AM

Unsolicited Advice for a Loan Officer’s Evolution – Learn to Underwrite

 

Since mid 2007, the mortgage originator as we know it has ceased to be.  The requirements for technical knowledge, industry awareness and precision have skyrocketed to the extent that a modern day loan originator is more of an “Under-iginator.” He/she must be 50% loan officer, 15% customer service/sales rep, 5% appraisal reviewer and 30% underwriter to have any business talking to a customer about a mortgage.  As well, the role of a processor has too changed.  Some repetition-based duties have been replaced with technological automation.  While those responsibilities have gone to the wayside, the secondary mortgage market has forced the job of a processor into that of a junior underwriter.  More is now required of all.

Having clear sets of responsibilities and divisions of labor for and between loan officers and processors is one of a two part need in making sure that file follow goes as it should (or more especially, as it can).  Because of the new demands of the modern mortgage marketplace, a loan officer and processor need to understand underwriting and the underwriter’s job in order to originate and process loans.  When an underwriter, processor and loan originator all have a modicum of understanding of one another’s job, empathy is achieved and that empathy improves the “hand off” of the files in the loan cycle.  While the collective skill level of loan officers in today’s market is higher than that of 2007, more is asked of us.  The approach outlined below is good for all of us and consequently, good for the customer.

I have done all kinds of training.  Most of it is a joke.  The best underwriting training that I’ve participated in for underwriting was sponsored by Freddie Mac (outside of certification classes).  Because most loan officers are a Third Party Originator (TPO) or Seller Servicer with Freddie Mac, they can get this training for free.  HOWEVER!!!, when you schedule your class, should you not be able to make it for whatever reason, you have to formally cancel or you’ll be subject to a 50 dollar fee so make sure you attend.  Freddie Mac’s training can be found at http://www.freddiemac.com/learn/uw/.  Registration for their classes can be done here (you’ll have to set up a student ID).  When registering, be prepared to provide your Freddie Mac TPO/Seller Servicer number.  At a minimum, loan officers and processors should take the following classes:

  • Documenting Acceptable Sources of Funds
  • Underwriting Income and Employment
  • Getting Started with Loan Prospector® – Part 1
  • Getting Started with Loan Prospector® – Part 2
  • Collateral Assessment Review

In lieu of doing this training, you could become a certified mortgage underwriter (CMU) from the National Association of Mortgage Underwriters (http://www.mortgage-underwriters.org/certified-mortgage-underwriter-cmu).  Some might see this as overkill but not only does it help with building a knowledge base, it also helps when dealing with underwriters.  By this designation, they will know you to be trained and credible.  Lastly, your HUD Homeownership Center will sponsor some web based underwriting training that can be worthwhile.

The other benefit of doing this is that you’ll be equipped to use what I think is the best method of origination available.  It follows this process:

  1. Take accurate 1003, structure loan, price loan and run findings.
  2. Look for what might kill the deal and make sure that there are no guideline violations by using the following methods:
    1. Consult co-workers
    2. Consult FNMA and/or FHLMC sellers guides (link below) – if conventional
    3. Consult HUD FHA Credit Analysis Handbook (link below) – if FHA
    4. Consult VA Credit Analysis Handbook (link below) – if VA
    5. Consult PMI guidelines (if applicable)
    6. Consult investor guideline overlays via their online selling guides
    7. IF AND ONLY IF ALL OF THESE METHODS FAIL contact the underwriter but if these methods failed don’t expect him/her to necessarily know either.
  3. After you’ve followed this logical process of due diligence, make sure to notate the loan file in your LOS’s conversation log with the guideline passages, conversations, links of interest and other documentation so that other staff won’t need to do the same work twice.  Always remember that there isn’t a lot of trust in lending these days so don’t expect someone to take your word for it.  Proof is the key.
  4. Collect docs and disclosures
  5. Reconcile income and assets on the 1003 with documents provided by the borrower.
  6. Re-run findings
  7. Submit loan
  8. Forget about the loan and let the processor do the rest unless absolutely needed

Each time this process is done, it gets easier to do.  It is THE MOST PRECISE way of originating and processing loans and precision makes the process go faster which ultimately serves us and the customer best.  Below, please find invaluable pre-underwriting resources and methods by which you can stay on the cutting edge of lending changes. 

Useful Underwriting Links

As a mortgage professional, you must not be content to wait to hear about upcoming changes from investors; you know that you need to follow Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and FHA.  The changes have been fast and furious over the last three years.  Browsing web pages and trade journals can be a time consuming nuisance.  They are helpful for clarification should you already have the information in your hands but I recommend the following e-mail subscriptions and RSS feeds to stay on top of things:

Fannie Mae: Fannie offers you a choice of alert types and updates to subscribe to at https://www.efanniemae.com/lc/newsletters/index.jsp.

Freddie Mac: Freddie has similar offerings at http://www.loanprospector.com/news/subscribe.html, and http://www.freddiemac.com/learn/subscribe/.

FHA: The best free resource for FHA updates would be subscribing to this RSS feedhttp://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/hudclips/whatsnew/hudclipsrss.xml (internet explorer) and the best paid subscription, in my opinion, would be Chip Cummings’ ABC’s of FHA found here http://www.fha-lending.com/.

Most have thought that this approach is overkill and that nobody will go to the trouble of making these investments of time and energy into academic pursuits.  What I have seen is that those who do make this investment end up out producing those that don’t.  Also, these loan officers have better lock pull through, underwriting pull through and better relationships with other parties in the loan cycle.  Most of all, the loan officers that take these steps seem to inspire more confidence in their clients and Realtors.  To me, that alone makes the investment worth it.

 

Charles Dailey - iLoan - NMLS ID# 79048 - CA DOC, MN DOC & WI DFI

8 commentsCharles Dailey - NMLS ID# 79048 • May 30 2010 04:26PM

Fannie Mae "Loan Quality Initiative" begins June 1, 2010. How will this affect home buyers?

I was going to write an article on this topic but Amy Jones of ReMax in Arizona did a fine job of summarizing it.  She asks a question at the end and I chimed in this way:

"This will create new industries within an industry. 3rd party services for occupancy checks, QC policy review, loan auditing and reporting. It will add to the cost of lending. Inevitably, that will be passed on in some way in the same way the the additional costs of HVCC have been passed on to the consumer. It will also slow down the lending process just when it was beginning to speed up again. Sadly, I don't think that there will be a meaningful increase in loan quality as a product of this initiative. I am watching Freddie Mac. So far, they haven't gotten on board with a LQI initiative. They did get on board with the delivery of the appraisal data and conversion to XML but that's it so far. If they don't jump on board with this overkill, look for lenders to switch from selling to Fannie Mae to Freddie Mac (which would suit me fine because I'm a Freddie lover)."

Charles Dailey - iLoan - NMLS ID# 79048

Via Amy Jones (Chandler, Arizona RE/Max Excalibur):

Beginning with applications dated June 1st, Fannie Mae is implementing the “Loan Quality Initiative” (LQI) guidelines.  All Fannie Mae lenders must adhere to these guidelines.  In a nutshell, the LQI guideline changes are:

  1. fannie mae loansCredit re-verification the day of funding:  Fannie Mae will require the borrower’s credit to be repulled the day of funding.  If the credit obligations change by more than 2%, the loan is required to go back to underwriting for approval.  Peoples Mortgage will reverify credit obligations on the borrower’s credit report (this will not be a hard pull of credit and will not affect their credit score; it is simply a verification of all current obligations).  Buyers should be made aware of  this rule so they know they should not purchase any large ticket items or have their credit pulled during the escrow process.  This could end up disqualifying them from buying their home at the very last minute.  This has always been true, but some lenders were not in the practice of pulling credit toward the end of escrow.  Now it will be mandated
  2. Excluded Party Lists:  Fannie Mae will require all parties to the transaction be checked against the “excluded party” lists, which are managed by HUD and by the General Services Administration.  These federal lists cover a broad array of risk categories, including fraud, gross negligence, and lack of business integrity.  Individuals have been placed on these lists for both mortgage-specific and non-mortgage-specific activities.  Government loans have always used the GSA list to exclude anyone included.  This will not impact most borrowers.  Those borrowers who are on the list are aware they are on the GSA list;
  3. Social Security Number Validation: The borrower’s social security number must be validated.  Depending on the findings of the credit report pull and “Desktop Underwriting”, the borrower may be requested to show their valid social security card or additional documentation; in some cases the underwriting lender may be requested to contact the Social Security Administration to verify a SSN.
  4. Validation of Intent to Occupy:  Fannie Mae is requiring all investors to verify the borrower’s intent to occupy the property.  This may include employing 3rd-party services that specialize in investigating occupancy information, reviewing the hazard insurance policy or utility bills to confirm occupancy of the property following funding of the loan.  This has been an issue for years with buyers claiming they intend to occupy the premises in order to obtain a lower interest rate, with the full intention of using the property as a rental. 

Please speak with your Lender for more information and details or visit Fannie Mae Loan Quality Initiatives Frequently Asked Questions.

I feel these are all positive changes.  A little like closing the barn door once the horse has escaped...but positive changes nonetheless.  What do you think?

  _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Chandler homes for sale               Sun Lakes Homes for Sale               Gilbert Homes for Sale         Tempe Homes for Sale       Ahwatukee Homes for Sale
Search Chandler Homes      Search Sun Lakes Homes       Search Gilbert Homes        Search Tempe Homes     Search Ahwatukee Homes

Amy_Jones_RealtorAmy Jones, REALTOR, ABR, CNE, EPro, CDPE
Direct~480-250-3857
Chandler, Sun Lakes, Gilbert, Tempe & Ahwatukee Real Estate
Phoenix Business Journal "Top 50 Real Estate Agent"
 
REMAX Excalibur

4921 S. Alma School Rd
Chandler, Arizona 85248

Visit www.AmySellsAZ.com for more information including free MLS search.
Visit
www.PhoenixArizonaRealEstateBlog.com  for a comprehensive Phoenix Area Blog.
Visit
www.SunLakesBlog.com about living in Sun Lakes, AZ.
Check out home values in your neighborhood!

 

Charles Dailey - iLoan - NMLS ID# 79048 - CA DOC, MN DOC & WI DFI

3 commentsCharles Dailey - NMLS ID# 79048 • May 30 2010 05:37AM

Buying a Home after a Short Sale - Don't Believe the Naysayers

I've written on this subject before but I want to be more thorough this time.  There have been too many articles put out lately that discourage people from contemplating a home purchase after doing a short sale.  These articles express cynicism about home sellers' financial habits and Realtors alike.  Most Realtors doing short sales know how to cover the bases for their client to make sure they're in a good position to buy a home down the road.  Further, in my area (Saint Paul, MN), nearly 39% of homeowners are upside down on their home.  Only a minority of these homeowners who would do a short sale on their home have destroyed credit.  All too often unfortunately, they are told that they won't be able to buy a new home for 2-7 years and, consequently, they let their credit go.  This assumption of a waiting period is not true and serves as harmful information to the homeowner doing a short sale.

Prior to December 16th of 2009 there was no FHA rule prohibiting homeowners who had a recent short sale from purchasing a home.  Few took advantage of this because the lending industry was wary and wanted clarification from HUD on whether this was ok or not.  On December 16th of 2009, HUD gave that clarity with Mortgagee Letter 09-52  which allows a people to buy a home after a short sale if "they were current on their mortgage and other installment debts at the time of the short sale of their previously owned property, and the proceeds from the short sale serve as payment in full."  One caveat to this; FHA will not allow the new loan if the borrower did a short sale "simply to take advantage of declining market conditions, and purchase, at a reduced price, a similar or superior property within a reasonable commuting distance."  When this rule came out, many thought that despite the fact that HUD allowed for a purchase subsequent to a short sale, no lenders would go along with it.  They were wrong.  Most lenders have adopted the rule as outlined in the mortgagee letter without additional underwriting guideline overlays.  

But this did not deter the naysayers.  They would assert that even if HUD and lender guidelines allow for it, the IRS would kill the deal.  It's true that a short sale can create a taxable event.  Because I am not a CPA or a tax lawyer, I will refer you to IRS Publication 4681 which explains in detail what the tax consequences can be after a short sale.  There are handy scenarios, examples and useful information of every kind.  So a buyer who has a tax lien can't buy a new home, right?  Wrong.

According to the FHA mortgage credit analysis handbook 4155.1 REV-5, 2-5 (B), a homebuyer with a tax lien is eligible for a FHA loan when, "the delinquent account is brought current, paid, otherwise satisfied, or a satisfactory repayment plan is made between the borrower and the Federal agency owed and is verified in writing. Tax liens may remain unpaid provided the lien holder subordinates the tax lien to the FHA-insured mortgage. If any regular payments are to be made, they must be included in the qualifying ratios."  It goes onto read, ""Since the IRS routinely takes a second lien position without the necessity of independent documentation, eligibility for FHA mortgage insurance will not be jeopardized by outstanding IRS tax liens remaining on the property unless the lender has information that the IRS has demanded a first-lien position."  That's right.  The lien can be left unpaid and it will automatically subordinate to the new FHA loan without the need of additional paperwork.

But the naysayers are not yet done.  They will say, "Oh but with a short sale and a tax lien, their credit will be obliterated.  There's just no way they'll qualify."  All a borrower needs is a 620 middle credit score.  Some lenders (I'm not one of them), will even go lower.  I'm going to address this objection with an anecdote (and really, this is not an isolated incident - sadly, it happens more common than you think.)  I recently had an applicant pull a 622 middle score.  On this credit report was a judgment and 19 collections.  That's it.  This person had defaulted on every extension of credit ever given and still pulled a 622.  Not that an IRS tax lien and short sale aren't damaging but, come on, they far from rule anything out.

My point in writing this is to serve as a reminder that in a lot of areas nearly two fifths or more of us are upside down, may want to move and are not deadbeats.  Also, I wanted to get this out there to provide the facts to dispel the myth that homeowners who do a short sale are only welcome to take a timeout from homeownership.  This is not their only choice.  They're welcome to continuing homeownership in the same way as the rest of us, . . . . Conditionally. :)

Charles Dailey - iLoan - NMLS ID# 79048 - CA DOC, MN DOC & WI DFI

4 commentsCharles Dailey - NMLS ID# 79048 • May 30 2010 03:02AM

Monthly Private Mortgage Insurance – It Doesn’t Make Any Sense

It is inevitable that FHA will play less and less of a role in the lending market.  As this unfolds, it's critical for loan officers, Realtors and borrowers alike to understand the many options in the improving private mortgage insurance market.  In the distant days when home values were increasing, it made perfect sense for borrowers to opt for monthly mortgage insurance and wait till their home had appreciated to the point where they had a twenty percent equity position. They'd soon call their lender to get an appraisal ordered and drop their monthly mortgage insurance.  Those days are gone.  In times prior to the days where home values were increasing, there was not a diversity of private mortgage insurance products to choose from nor were there dramatic differences and complexities in the underwriting of private mortgage insurance.  Those days are gone as well.

As though there isn't already enough to know, real estate professionals need to know the differences between the mortgage insurance providers (i.e. RMIC, PMI, Radian, MGIC, Genworth, United Guaranty, Commonwealth and others).  They also must know the advantages and disadvantages of the different types of premiums.  For simplicities sake, let's just mention lender paid mortgage insurance (LPMI), borrower paid monthly, split premium and single premium.  Sadly, if you look up mortgage insurance on Wikipedia, you won't even see split premium or single premium and they make more sense than LPMI and borrower paid monthly offerings.  This typifies the problem borrower's face in today's market.

Let's start with the basics.  Here are some working definitions:

1.       Borrower Paid Monthly Mortgage Insurance - For this premium type, the cost of the monthly premium is rated by the loan to value and credit score.  Although guidelines vary between insurers and from state to state, typically, the monthly payment must be made for a minimum of 2 years and isn't droppable until the borrower has a twenty percent equity position in their home.  For this to happen through making the minimum payments and appreciation in this market,  it would be a long time before that happened.  For that reason, in this market, monthly mortgage insurance is the worst of all choices. 

2.       Lender Paid Mortgage Insurance - First one should know LPMI really is.  It's basically an insurance premium that the lender pays on behalf of the borrower.  However, this is done by offering a higher than market rate.  When there weren't tax benefits associated with private mortgage insurance or a diversity of mortgage insurance products in the marketplace, LPMI had its role.  These days, that role is minimal at best.  There are instances where it makes sense but they are so few that they aren't worth mentioning.

3.       Split Premium Mortgage Insurance - This is the newest of the offerings.  It works similarly to FHA mortgage insurance premiums.  A portion of the overall premium is paid up front (by a borrower or seller) or it can be financed into the loan and in exchange, the amount of monthly mortgage insurance is reduced.  Not all insurance providers offer this product and it really should only be used when single premium mortgage insurance is not an option due to excessive costs or something of that nature.

4.       Single Premium Mortgage Insurance - In most, and I dare say nearly all cases these days, this is the best option.  This is where there is a fee paid one time and it eliminates any monthly mortgage insurance and does not adversely affect the interest rate.  And that's it.  One time and it's gone.  In nearly all cases, where a borrower has a middle credit score of 680 or better and a loan to value of between 80.01% and 95% (assumptions apply to the market as of the date of this article), this premium will pay for itself in approximately 24 months.  Sometimes it takes a little longer and sometimes it takes less time to pay for itself but it's usually approximately 24 months.  This single or one time premium can be paid by the borrower, a seller and in some cases financed into the loan.  A common misperception is that a seller can't pay for more than 3% towards closing costs.  This is only true for loans with loan to values greater than 90%.  For loans with loan to values between 80% and 90%, the seller can pay up to 6% towards closing costs so the premium can often be worked into the seller concessions in a purchase agreement.

Between the middle of 2007 and the 4th quarter of 2009, private mortgage insurance premiums rose and guidelines were tightened.  That trend has reversed.  For the private mortgage insurance companies, getting the word out that their products have improved has been difficult at best.  PMI even went to the trouble of creating an online calculator to show how much cheaper private mortgage insurance is when compared to FHA's mortgage insurance premiums (particularly how much cheaper single premium insurance is).  The sooner real estate professionals are aware of this trend; the better the public will be served.

Always shop for mortgage insuranceThis is a big one.  I don't know of a meaningful mortgage insurance company that doesn't have an online mortgage insurance calculator.  Not only are there definite price differences between premium types but there are different prices between mortgage insurance providers.  Most borrowers spend less time shopping for a mortgage than they spend shopping for a car and they spend most of that time evaluating rates and closing costs when, often times, they'd save more money shopping for mortgage insurance.  These mortgage insurance calculators can tell a borrower which vendor they want for their transaction even in the event that their loan officer doesn't counsel them on the choices.

Another misperception is that the mortgage broker, mortgage banker or banks dictate who the mortgage insurance company will be.  This is only partly true.  If a mortgage broker is arranging a loan for a borrower through say, AmTrust, they can request mortgage insurance from MGIC or RMIC (and perhaps others).  A mortgage banker or correspondent lender is rarely only setup with one mortgage insurance company.  And rarely would a bank be captive to one insurer.  So, a borrower can and should shop for their mortgage insurance company and ask for them by name when they are asking for quotes on interest rates and closing costs.

A lot has changed in the housing market and those changes have changed the private mortgage insurance market.  Get to know your split and single premiums, shop for your private mortgage insurance and lose your belief that FHA is the high loan to value loan of choice (as far as I'm concerned, it's the loan of choice for borrowers with lower credit scores, rehab loans and buyers who just had a short sale and that's about it).

Click here to shop for private mortgage insurance using these online calculators!

Charles Dailey - iLoan - NMLS ID# 79048 - CA DOC, MN DOC & WI DFI

20 commentsCharles Dailey - NMLS ID# 79048 • May 30 2010 12:59AM

Upside Down on Your Home? – Here’s Your Playbook

In my home state of Minnesota, Minneapolis and Saint Paul have nearly 39 percent of homeowners under water.   I've had the question, "I'm upside down on my home, what are my options?" so many times that I wanted to prepare a menu of options for people to reference.  This article briefly outlines 9 potential solutions that may serve you well.  The target audience here is not necessarily someone who's in default on their loan but simply one who owes more than the home is worth.

All too often, when one is upside down on their home and/or struggling with their mortgage, they reach out for one to three options that they may have heard about on the news or from a friend.  What homeowners should be doing is seeking the advice of qualified real estate agents, real estate attorneys and a skilled loan officer.  But, . . . before a homeowner picks up the phone, there's a lot of homework to do!  Before one calls the professionals, they'll just be spinning their wheels until the following items are ready:

  1. Know your address.  You may know it to be one thing but for these purposes, your address is whatever http://www.usps.gov/ tells you it is.  So go to this website, click on "find a zip code" and type your address.  The postal service will then give you the address it has registered for you.  This is the address that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac use so it would serve you well to do the same.
  2. Collect your financial documents.  Whether you're working with a loan officer on a loan, a Realtor on a short sale or an attorney on a bankruptcy or modification, they'll all need a complete set of your financials.  This includes 09 and 08 tax returns, W2's and 1099's.  If you're self employed, you'll need 2009 and 2008 tax returns from your business.  If you haven't filed your 09's, get it done.  You'll also need copies of your most recent paystub, most recent bank statement, most recent statement on any retirement accounts, and a copy of a mortgage statement on each mortgage you have.  Getting these documents scanned to image documents such as Adobe Reader can really speed things up.
  3. Collect your legal documents.  It would be wise to, at the very least, have a copy of your mortgage note.  If you are planning on meeting with an attorney, it would be much better to have your entire closing package.  This should have been provided to you by the title company that closed your loan.  Again, getting these documents scanned to image documents such as Adobe Reader can really speed things up.
  4. This isn't necessary, but it's wise.  Get a copy of your credit report at http://www.annualcreditreport.com/ (this site is truly free and not a scam).  Knowing the content of your credit will help you write letters of explanation if you're doing a mortgage loan or a hardship letter if you're doing a short sale.

Getting this done is arduous but it will prove invaluable to those you ask for help.  Now you're ready for that menu of options:

  1. Fannie Mae DU Refi Plus - If your loan is owned by Fannie Mae, you may be entitled to refinance up to 125% of your home's value.  You can get a loose idea of what your home is worth at http://www.cyberhomes.com/.  To see if your home is owned by Fannie Mae, go to http://loanlookup.fanniemae.com/loanlookup/ and enter your address as it appeared at http://www.usps.gov/.  If it is owned by Fannie Mae and you owe less than 125% of the value of your home, you may be eligible for this loan.  The rates are slightly higher than normal advertised rates because of pricing add ons but they are close enough to market rates to be a heck of a deal.
  2. LP Open Access - If your loan is owned by Freddie Mac, you may be entitled to refinance up to 125% of your home's value.  You can get a loose idea of what your home is worth at http://www.cyberhomes.com/.  To see if your home is owned by Freddie Mac, go to https://ww3.freddiemac.com/corporate/ and enter your address as it appeared at http://www.usps.gov/.  If it is owned by Freddie Mac and you owe less than 125% of the value of your home, you may be eligible for this loan.  The rates are slightly higher than normal advertised rates because of pricing add ons but they are close enough to market rates.  This program will not let you finance more than 5 thousand dollars in closing costs and prepaids so if your settlement charges exceed 5 thousand, be prepared to bring cash to closing.
  3. FHA 115% Write Down Refi - This one doesn't have a name yet so I just made that up.  It's a complicated program and I'm not sure how successful it will be.  Essentially, if you're refinancing a non-FHA loan, you'd take a loan out at 97.75% of your home's value.  A balance may be subordinated to the first mortgage thus becoming a 2nd mortgage but that loan may not exceed 115% of the homes value.  For any of this to happen, the existing lender/s must write down their loan balances by at least 10%.  Here is the announcement for this program.  You must be current on your mortgage to qualify for this loan.  A history of late payments will likely disqualify you for this loan.
  4. FHA Short Refi - This one is a little simpler.  Essentially, you get preapproved for a 97.75% loan to value FHA refinance.  This loan will support a certain amount to be paid to your existing lender.  Whatever the loan can't support, assuming you can't come up with the difference in cash, will have to be written off by your existing lender.  You'd be surprised how many lenders are willing to do this (I know I have been).  This was officially permitted by HUD in December of 2009.  You must be current on your mortgage to qualify for this loan.  A history of late payments will likely disqualify you for this loan.
  5. Modification - You do not necessarily have to be in default to get a loan modification.  If you've had any kind of hardship (i.e. involuntary reductions of income or unavoidable increase in expenses that indicates that you might go into default and you feel that you owe so much on your home and at such poor terms that you're losing your incentive to repay, that might be enough to qualify.  Many people have their own opinions on this and I don't assume that mine is the best but I don't recommend contacting your lender directly as a starting point for a modification and I don't recommend calling a pay for hire service either.  I recommend calling 1-888-995-HOPE (4673) to speak with a HUD approved counselor for free.  They will conduct an interview and serve as an initial intermediary between you and your lender.
  6. Chapter 11 Bankruptcy - It's expensive, it's a long and hard process but unlike Chapter 7 and Chapter 13, a judge can order a mortgage modification under a Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan.  It is the most flexible type of bankruptcy and is thus difficult to explain.  Consult an attorney with specific Chapter 11 experience.
  7. Deed in Lieu - This is where the owner of a property deeds the property back to the lender to avoid foreclosure.  Obviously, this only makes sense if you want to get out of the situation quickly and don't want the house anymore.  I highly recommend the assistance of an attorney in this to ensure that the act of deeding in lieu serves as payment in full of your mortgage to prevent both damage to your credit and the potential of deficiency judgments
  8. Short Sale - A short sale is where a homeowner and lender cooperate to sell a home in a situation where more is owed on the home that the house is worth.  The buyer and their Realtor prepare the home for sale and market it and in exchange, the lender writes down the balance of their note to facilitate the sale.   It is less costly that foreclosure so lenders are typically willing to do this.  Often times, with the help of a good Realtor, damage to your credit can be ameliorated.  When choosing your agent, make sure they have a lot of past experience with short sales, are aware of what is changing in short sales and, preferably, they have done short sales that involve your current lender.
  9. Foreclosure - Now I hesitate to even mention this but a fact is a fact.  Foreclosure is an option.  If you're upside down and you can't make your payments, sometimes you just have to let go.  Too many people think the sheriff's sale is the end.  It's just a step in the process.  Although it varies by state, foreclosure is usually a 9 month process.  So, 9 months of living there and then you move out.  It's an ugly option. . . but it's an option.

When we are under stress, we often reach for the first or easiest option that might get us away from the cause of that stress.  In the case of the underwater homeowner, that can be a huge mistake.  Few know how many options they really have and, if these options are weighed carefully, they can learn that with some effort on their part and the help of qualified professionals, they can get away from their problem with a good solution in hand.

Please remember that all four of these loan types are very difficult and consequently, you'll need an excellent loan officer.  Managing your legal risk in a deed in lieu situation or conducting a Chapter 11 requires a seasoned and sophisticated attorney.  Proper execution of a short sale is both a science and an art so, if that's the route you take don't make a quick decision on a Realtor.  Just because they advertise as a short sale expert doesn't make it so.  Choose your professionals wisely, be deliberate in choosing the solution that you want and be organized and you'll find that you're closer to being stress free again than you think.

My heart goes out to you for your situation and, . . . if misery loves company, . . I'm right there with you!

Charles Dailey - iLoan - NMLS ID# 79048 - CA DOC, MN DOC & WI DFI

54 commentsCharles Dailey - NMLS ID# 79048 • April 04 2010 02:35AM